Home > Cannot Assign > Cannot Assign To This

Cannot Assign To This


It seems like something that should be handled, even Babel does it by default but I'm sure with the type information it can be clever when to apply it. Browse other questions tagged c# or ask your own question. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed And let's not ignore m[0]++ m[0][:] extemporalgenome commented Dec 11, 2012 Comment 5: I don't think this buys _too_ much, since even with this there'd be no way to "merge" values http://electrictricycle.net/cannot-assign/cannot-assign-a-nil-to-a.html

Related Sites Visual Studio Visual Studio Integrate VSIP Program Microsoft .NET Microsoft Azure Connect Forums Blog Facebook LinkedIn Stack Overflow Twitter Visual Studio Events YouTube Developer Resources Code samples Documentation Downloads You create a NEW MyType object and then throw it away by trying to deserialize the object and assign it to this. What is the total sum of the cardinalities of all subsets of a set? It says, "Cannot assign to '' because it is read-only". –AaronD Sep 26 '14 at 15:52 @RobertHarvey Would you like to make that an answer so I can accept http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18285087/why-cant-i-set-this-to-a-value-in-c

C# Deserialize This

This is redundant (and can be error prone). static Person getByID(long ID){ return DataManager.Find(typeof(Person),ID); }   Then to use the function all you have to do is Person myPerson=Person.getByID(1234); Also it seems like you're using generics in your find The hashmap implementation already uses pointer indirection anyway.

You cannot say this = null. Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 418,749 IT Pros & Developers. Other than that, it's a simple case of having to refactor the code. public class Photo { public Int32 PhotoId { get; set; } public Guid ObjectKey { get; set; } public Int16 Width { get; set; } public Int16 Height { get; set;

rsc commented Mar 12, 2013 Comment 6: [The time for maybe has passed.] rsc commented Nov 27, 2013 Comment 7: Labels changed: added go1.3maybe. C# Assign This How can I avoid being chastised for a project I inherited which was already buggy, but I was told to add features instead of fixing it? That being said, I think a better plan is make Load static and have it return a new Photo instance, this is the pattern you see most often in the .NET Trouble with maps ( i.e., map > ) I need $this->self to be identical to and reference to $this, but how in PHP 5.2+?

Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 10 Star 416 Fork 51 speedskater/babel-plugin-rewire Code Issues 16 Pull requests 0 Projects Cannot assign to because it is read-only P: n/a Michael A. Why do some airlines have different flight numbers for IATA and ICAO? Microsoft member rbuckton commented Feb 9, 2016 @blakeembrey The reason this fails is due to the fact that the make-error project explicitly marks constructor as non-writable, non-configurable. @RyanCavanaugh Any ES3 runtime

C# Assign This

Here's the list of things that were causing glitches with babel-plugin-rewire in my code (might help someone): Using a const object that is exported from a module, for instance I had my site Microsoft member rbuckton commented Feb 9, 2016 @blakeembrey I just tested the following in node v5: "use strict"; var __extends = (this && this.__extends) || function (d, b) { for (var C# Deserialize This I'm open to "you can't" (with an explanation) as I can put it elsewhere and just assign values, but my mind says something like this should be possible. C# Read Only Property Is that the right approach?

I don't know what the chance of an ES3 environment is that has a native read only property and supports 'use strict' (won't ES3 environments ignore that, I can't recall the Check This Out public static ArrivedDetails CreateFromEncryptedKey(string encrypted) { return DataProtect.deserializeXML(DataProtect.DecryptData(encrypted)); } ///... Go member minux commented Mar 12, 2015 This issue is not about pointers in Go. Is this the way to go? (pun intended.. ;) var tmp = m["foo"] tmp.x = 4 m["foo"] = tmp griesemer commented Dec 11, 2012 Comment 2: Yes, this is the "work-around".

Seems kind of an ugly work around. I just saw this bird outside my apartment. Find the function given its Fourier series more hot questions lang-cs about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life http://electrictricycle.net/cannot-assign/cannot-assign.html Change ArriveDetails to a static that return the deserialised object.

On 1941 Dec 7, could Japan have destroyed the Panama Canal instead of Pearl Harbor in a surprise attack? This is an unfortunate violation of Go's general memory safeness. While these seem to be easily resolved issues, there are various constraints that make the cost associated with these changes much too high with respect to the resulting value to the

Then I'm trying to set the C# 'this' object equal to the object returned by call to the data access tier.

Is it safe to use cheap USB data cables? Why is that a big deal? here the error is thrown exports.__GetDependency__ = _get__2("_get__"); exports.__Rewire__ = _get__2("_set__"); exports.__set__ = _get__2("_set__"); exports.__ResetDependency__ = _get__2("_reset__"); exports.__RewireAPI__ = _get__2("_RewireAPI__"); var _RewiredData__2 = {}; var _RewireAPI__2 = {}; ERROR: Uncaught TypeError: What direction should I be heading in, here?

If you want less memory fragmentation and better cache lining, use "2nd order allocators". You signed in with another tab or window. I can make a PR, my only question is whether this should be detected at runtime (E.g. have a peek here Thanks!

Covington "Chris Dunaway"

It's also error-prone because I might add something to the class and forget to copy it. Tank-Fighting Alien Where in the analytic hierarchy is the theory of true set theory? So even though I have a fine method for foo.WriteToFile(filename), I can't implement foo.LoadFromFile(filename). Covington wrote: Let me elaborate a little.

If you choose to participate, the online survey will be presented to you when you leave the Msdn Web site.Would you like to participate? I should try that. It's also error-prone because Imight add something to the class and forget to copy it.Ideas? Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 1,842 Star 21,773 Fork 2,867 golang/go Code Issues 2,400 Pull requests 1 Projects

Browse other questions tagged c# dapper dapper-extensions or ask your own question. blakeembrey commented Feb 9, 2016 Would there be a consideration to always emit using defineProperty then? There are frameworks like AutoMapper for mapping between objects. c# serialization object share|improve this question edited Mar 22 '11 at 23:05 John Saunders 138k20179324 asked Mar 22 '11 at 22:59 dotalchemy 1,902919 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest

public static Photo Load(int pPhotoId) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(Settings.Conn)) { conn.Open(); return conn.Get(pPhotoId); } } share|improve this answer answered Aug 17 '13 at 4:37 Scott Chamberlain 71.9k19117223 add