Home > Cannot Attach > Cannot Attach To Shared Memory Informix

Cannot Attach To Shared Memory Informix

Upgrade to SQL2k 3. Oracle Error 27123:Unable to attach to shared memory 4 post • Page:1 of 1 All times are UTC Board index Spam Report Submit feedback to IBM Support 1-800-IBM-7378 (USA) Directory of worldwide contacts Contact Privacy Terms of use Accessibility Login by ID Login by Member # Save Password: Save As son as I do that, I'll send you the messages.Thanks again. Source

Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy. Read 10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. osql and sp_attach_db 7. Oninit -i seems to > work fine, but when I issue onmode -ky or onstat, I receive the message > "cannot attach to shared memory". http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21238293

Read 11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... You can track this item individually or track all items by product. for finding thge mail cause.hthUwe Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate.

Local fix Problem summary **************************************************************** * USERS AFFECTED: * * Users using small values (or default value) for SHMADD are * * more likely to run into this problem. * **************************************************************** The size of the segment is 68719476736 bytes, so the address range used by it would be 0x2aaaaac00000 - 0x2abaaac00000. Need access to an account?If your company has an existing Red Hat account, your organization administrator can grant you access. Submit feedback to IBM Support 1-800-IBM-7378 (USA) Directory of worldwide contacts Contact Privacy Terms of use Accessibility United States English English IBM® Site map IBM IBM Support Check here to

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.It's easy to join and it's free. This file might belong to another instance of IDS server. Read 20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... try here Any ideas? > Really stuck here! > Thanks In Advance Top cannot attach to shared memory by Brett Gee » Fri, 03 Nov 2000 15:12:57 Okies, first things

This is the kernel-dump from the crash. Watson Product Search Search None of the above, continue with my search Informix utilities cannot attach to shared memory, errno 22, on Linux Red Hat shmat: [22]; shmat; errno 14; SHMMAX; errno : 22 But when i launch it manually (oninit), no problem. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

We Acted. additional hints any warnings about the SHMBASE address? The /proc//maps file shows that system libraries are loaded in a low address, for example you can see this from a test binary in a system which creates similar shared memory Read 25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank...

errno = 22 You ran 'oninit -v' and it worked, however you then noticed that you now have two sets of 'oninit' processes running while there should be only one: $ this contact form Read 31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read 24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Join Us! *Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail.

Send a mail with the problem description, your S/N, online.log, onconfig and the af.3e969b9 files to them.Pls take a look in the /tmp. Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members! I am running IDS 7.31 UC4 on an AIX 4.3.3 box. have a peek here In this scenario, the ontape process sent 0x52574806 as unique key for first Informix virtual segment to the OS.

I read on the manuals that whithout network, I can use a loopback configuration and also a shared memory configuration. Oninit -i seems to > work fine, but when I issue onmode -ky or onstat, I receive the message > "cannot attach to shared memory". brett > Hi all.

Environment Informix Server on Linux Diagnosing the problem Identify the shmem segments used by your instance: $ onstat -g seg Segment Summary:

Read 2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... This is the stack from your crash. Cancel Red Flag SubmittedThank you for helping keep Tek-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.The Tek-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action. onstat: Cannot attach to shared memory.

Read Previous news items End of Support Dates IDS 11.10 - 30 Sep 2012 Subscribe to notifications Home Member Area About IIUG Help Resources IIUG Insider IIUG Hotspots Informix Links Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums: Talk To Other Members Notification Of Responses To Questions Favorite Forums One Click Access Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More... Watson Product Search Search None of the above, continue with my search Oncheck cannot attach to shared memory. Check This Out Talk With Other Members Be Notified Of ResponsesTo Your Posts Keyword Search One-Click Access To YourFavorite Forums Automated SignaturesOn Your Posts Best Of All, It's Free!

Join UsClose Red Hat Customer Portal Skip to main content Main Navigation Products & Services Back View All Products Infrastructure and Management Back Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Virtualization Red Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log Already a member? Hello, C:\Windows\system32>onstat - MapViewOfFileEx: w32ec=487 at nt_shm.c:767 12:07:28 shmat: [22]: operating system error 12:07:28 Client could not attach server shared memory segment, use IFX_XFER_SHM BASE.

errno = 22 above error comming with informix 11.50TC9 and windows server 2003 standard any one have idea about and have face this ever.