Home > Cannot Attach > Cannot Attach To Shared Memory

Cannot Attach To Shared Memory

I found a mention about it in some thread but no solution (I think it was deleted) Help, please. There is no server for database <>. (1423). Read 20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... It's key is marked as 0x00000000 by ipcs -m and cannot be attached anymore by other processes - it's in fact marked for lazy deletion. have a peek here

Read 9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read 14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read 9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Newton's second law for individual forces Were the Smurfs the first to smurf their smurfs? http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21238293

Read 31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... See this page Thanks it worked!!! Read 21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... I can assume you can just use another symblic link name to start database without moving of it.

Read 2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... here is the odd part! prostrct repair Remarks: If a database lock (.lk) file exists for the database, it will be necessary to make sure that no process is using the database and remove that Progress Software Corporation makes no explicit or implied claims to the validity of this information.

However, this call has the side effect of making the segment private even though it was created without using the IPC_EXCL flag. Problem with Progress: shared memory Discussion in 'Database Admin' started by Kopperton, Aug 30, 2005. Terms of use *** Powered By IBM Informix Dynamic Server V11.10 - Run Cheetah Run*** BắpRang's house Bắp Rang, iambaprang, baprang, BắpRang Search Search for: Go Home Subscribe About I have one process that creates and writes to a shared memory segment just fine.

The permissions are giving you, well, permission, not making a demand. –Duck Mar 7 '14 at 23:49 thank you for your response Duck. Read 1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Due to low SHMMAX size, Informix resident and virtual shared memory segments broken down into multiple OS memory segments. The sample code is provided on an "AS IS" basis.

Lookup the progress knowledge base always.. I can live with having to pass 2 parameters: the file name like "/dev/null" and the same shared id (nSharedMemoryID in my code). Using 0 for the size in the 2nd processes shmget() makes sense to me--thanks for confirming that so I know that is not the problem. –Andres Gonzalez Mar 8 '14 at Progress makes no warranties, express or implied, and disclaims all implied warranties including, without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose.

SEMMSL left unchanged. navigate here That is why this seems so strange to me. FIX: In some support cases you may need to know what Shared Memory Segments are attached to Progress Databases. (For example; in the case of a database crash where the shared Is the English word "ikebana" a suitable translation for "華道"?

Following 'ipcs -m' command showing, Informix resident and virtual segment are consists of 5 OS memory segments each: Informix utilities, i.e., ontape, onbar, oncheck, etc. I found a mention about it in some thread but no solution (I think it was deleted) This may be caused by the file permissions of the feeder. All new questions should be directed to the appropriate forum at the SAP Community Network (SCN). Check This Out Regards, Heinz Bret Halford Posted on 2011-05-13 16:47:05.0Z From: Bret Halford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10MIME-Version: 1.0Newsgroups: sybase.public.ase.administrationSubject: Re: shared memoryReferences: <[email protected]>In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15;

And if yes, than ASE is able to start without an entry in /etc/system ( Solaris ) for shared memory? /Heinz Cory Sane [TeamSybase] Posted on 2011-05-15 06:16:00.0Z From: "Cory Sane Just added a main() around it. Feedback Was this article helpful?

This is my code in the 2nd process: int nSharedMemoryID = 10; key_t tKey = ftok("/dev/null", nSharedMemoryID); if (tKey == -1) { std::cerr << "ERROR: ftok(id: " << nSharedMemoryID << ")

How do I sort files into a sub-folder based on filename part? Log-based Change Data Capture... Progress Software Corporation makes all reasonable efforts to verify this information. SOLUTION Choose one of following options: Tune the SHMMAX kernel parameter Set onconfig parameter SHMVIRTSIZE and SHMADD same as SHMMAX kernel parameter EXAMPLES The following are some Linux operating system commands

However, shmid 14090247 is invalid in respect to Informix shared memory segments because there is no key associated with that shmid. Progress Software Corporation makes no explicit or implied claims to the validity of this information. how can it be "possible" if the key is the same - see the attached output in the new edit –Sigismondo Mar 8 '14 at 0:57 | show 4 more comments this contact form Thanks for also confirming that the mode is only relevant for the creation process--that makes sense.

Please tell us how we can make this article more useful. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here...